--- description: Dowiedz się wszystkiego na temat GitHub od zweryfikowanych użytkowników. Czytaj recenzje i odkrywaj podobne narzędzia na Capterra Polska! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: GitHub – Sprawdź cenę i opinie klientów | Capterra Polska --- Breadcrumb: [Strona główna](/) > [Oprogramowanie do rozwoju aplikacji](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [GitHub](/software/129067/github) # GitHub Canonical: https://www.capterra.pl/software/129067/github Page: 1 / 250\ Dalej: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pl/software/129067/github?page=2) > GitHub umożliwia zespołom programistów współpracę oraz przeglądanie i zarządzanie kodem w ramach potoku DevOps i wbudowanego zabezpieczenia kodu. > > Verdict: Rated **4.8/5** by 6206 users. Top-rated for **Prawdopodobieństwo polecenia**. ----- ## Overview ### Kto korzysta z produktu: GitHub? Opracowywanie oprogramowania dla małych start-upów i dużych przedsiębiorstw. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Informacje ogólne** | **4.8/5** | 6206 Recenzje | | Łatwość użytkowania | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Wsparcie klienta | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Warte swojej ceny | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Funkcje | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Prawdopodobieństwo polecenia) | ## Informacje o sprzedawcy - **Firma**: Microsoft - **Location**: Redmond, USA - **Founded**: 1975 ## Commercial Context - **Cena początkowa**: 4,00 USD - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) (Bezpłatna wersja próbna) - **Target Audience**: Samozatrudnienie, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Chmura, SaaS, internetowy, Mac (pulpit), Windows (pulpit), Windows (stacjonarny), Linux (stacjonarny), Android (mobilny), iPhone (mobilny), iPad (mobilny) - **Supported Languages**: angielski - **Available Countries**: Arabia Saudyjska, Australia, Austria, Belgia, Białoruś, Brazylia, Bułgaria, Chiny, Chorwacja, Dania, Egipt, Estonia, Finlandia, Francja, Hiszpania, Holandia, Indie, Indonezja, Irak, Islandia and 27 more ## Funkcje - Aplikacja mobilna - Automated Testing - Bezpieczeństwo aplikacji - Ciągła integracja - Ciągłe dostawy - Ciągłe wdrażanie - Debugowanie - Graficzny interfejs użytkownika - Gwarancja jakości - Kontrola wersji - Monitorowanie - Narzędzia do pracy zespołowej - Pulpit - Raportowanie/śledzenie projektu - Real-Time Analytics - Recenzja kodu - Rozwój współpracy - Skanowanie słabych punktów - Udostępnianie plików - Wychwytywanie błędów/problemów - Zarządzanie biletami - Zarządzanie konfiguracją - Zarządzanie projektami - Zarządzanie repozytorium - Zarządzanie sprawami - Zarządzanie zadaniami - Zarządzanie zaległościami - Zarządzanie zwolnieniami - Zintegrowane środowisko programistyczne - Śledzenie błędów - Śledzenie kamieni milowych - Śledzenie postępów w realizacji zadań - Śledzenie spraw ## Integrations (15 total) - CircleCI - Docker - Git - Heroku - JIRA Service Management - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Pivotal Tracker - Slack - Trello - Vercel - Visual Studio Code ## Support Options - E-mail/helpdesk - Często zadawane pytania/forum - Baza wiedzy ## Category - [Oprogramowanie do rozwoju aplikacji](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## Powiązane kategorie - [Oprogramowanie do rozwoju aplikacji](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [Systemy kontroli wersji](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) - [Aplikacje do zarządzania projektami w organizacji non profit](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) - [Programy do zarządzania projektami](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [Systemy ciągłej integracji](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/31119/continuous-integration/software) ## Rozwiązania alternatywne 1. [SpiraTeam](https://www.capterra.pl/software/85434/spirateam) — 4.2/5 (98 reviews) 2. [BugHerd](https://www.capterra.pl/software/129027/bugherd) — 4.7/5 (65 reviews) 3. [GitLab](https://www.capterra.pl/software/159806/gitlab) — 4.6/5 (1227 reviews) 4. [Airtable](https://www.capterra.pl/software/146652/airtable) — 4.6/5 (2244 reviews) 5. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.pl/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (3042 reviews) ## Recenzje ### "Github is an Essential Developer Tool" — 5.0/5 > **Christopher** | *17 sierpnia 2026* | Technologia i usługi informacyjne | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Zalety**: Github is now the defacto standard for version control. Easy to use and works great\! I used to use BitBucket before Github, but the interface on Github is much better. > > **Wady**: Some of the recent pushes are more focused on bringing in money. I like when they pushed usage more. Developers would use the product forcing companies to buy into the project. That was a better model. > > A must have. Github has a lot of cool tools like pipelines, AI code editors, and other offerings that make this a must have tool for any modern developer. ----- ### "A solid tool for everyday development and collaboration" — 4.0/5 > **Manuel** | *12 sierpnia 2026* | Szpitale i opieka zdrowotna | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Zalety**: The biggest thing for me is how easy it makes collaboration. I use it a lot for pull requests, code reviews, and keeping track of changes, and it all feels pretty straightforward. > > **Wady**: The UI can feel a little cluttered sometimes, especially when you’re jumping between repos, issues, and pull requests. Some features also take a bit of digging to find or understand at first. > > Overall, my experience with GitHub has been really positive. I use it pretty regularly for repos, pull requests, code reviews, and team collaboration, and it’s become a pretty essential part of my workflow. ----- ### "Paved the way for source control but is having trouble" — 3.0/5 > **Zweryfikowany recenzent** | *25 sierpnia 2026* | Zarządzanie edukacją | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Zalety**: Github is the easiest way to collaborate with code with a very generous free tier. It has been around for a while so the toolset and concepts are very mature at this stage. > > **Wady**: Recently the performance of Github has been incredibly spotty and quite poor overall. This diminishes the reliability of the tool and its reputation as a trusted company. ----- ### "Important platform for version control and CI/CD but expensive to scale" — 5.0/5 > **Ekpono** | *21 września 2026* | Tłumaczenia i lokalizacja | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Zalety**: Hosting free github private repositories, CI/CD using Github Actions, code review by AI and teammates. Pull Request and commits. issue tracking and forking public repositories etc. Github is fast, reliable and makes managing different code branches across different projects really simple > > **Wady**: Subscription gets expensive once your team grows. You have to pay per seat. Downloading Github action log is not available. Switching copilot to be usage based instead of subscription base is terrible > > Githbu is really realiable and team collaboration is top tier. Github action for your CI/CD is the best in the industry. and everything version control is seamless. per seat gets expensive real fast when your team grows and recent update of changing co-pilot billing to be usage based also adds to the cost. ----- ### "Keeps it simple and polished" — 4.0/5 > **Ioannis** | *19 sierpnia 2026* | Rozrywka | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Zalety**: No-nonsense UI - it is one of the few where I never got use out of the "Zapper" tool of uBlock Origin, as everything has its place. Very good documentation for all parts of GitHub. Strong integrations with just about everything that affects a software development lifecycle. Clear ways to interact with it through many forms, including a rich command line client. Also, a high number of developers are on it which is a great boon for open source projects. > > **Wady**: Data portability - the issue tracker is deliberately quite simple (and I don't think it should be made more complex) but after a certain point, does not scale to everyone's needs. It is hard to move off of GitHub, at least for tracking issues. The pull request review process is quite noisy and sometimes hard to get to grips with. For example, it's not clear that you need to "Submit" your review to actually propose changes. The propose changes feature is very nice as it means you don't have to leave your browser, but is not very clearly exposed in the UI. Some social elements are undesirable, like "Achievements", which lead to drive-by interactions with open source projects. Their users are "in GitHub", but not "in projects" so to speak. I believe this creates poor incentives for the open source community, as it brings people further apart from becoming long term contributors, as they are chasing virtual badges instead of real community engagement. > > Positive - it has historically and I would say it is still one of the best when it comes to keeping it simple. They have been conservative with adding features and I believe that's the right approach on the whole. ----- Page: 1 / 250\ Dalej: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pl/software/129067/github?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.pl/software/129067/github) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data