--- description: Dowiedz się wszystkiego na temat GitHub od zweryfikowanych użytkowników. Czytaj recenzje i odkrywaj podobne narzędzia na Capterra Polska! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: GitHub – Sprawdź cenę i opinie klientów | Capterra Polska --- Breadcrumb: [Strona główna](/) > [Oprogramowanie do rozwoju aplikacji](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [GitHub](/software/129067/github) # GitHub Canonical: https://www.capterra.pl/software/129067/github Page: 1 / 249\ Dalej: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pl/software/129067/github?page=2) > GitHub umożliwia zespołom programistów współpracę oraz przeglądanie i zarządzanie kodem w ramach potoku DevOps i wbudowanego zabezpieczenia kodu. > > Verdict: Rated **4.8/5** by 6182 users. Top-rated for **Prawdopodobieństwo polecenia**. ----- ## Overview ### Kto korzysta z produktu: GitHub? Opracowywanie oprogramowania dla małych start-upów i dużych przedsiębiorstw. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Informacje ogólne** | **4.8/5** | 6182 Recenzje | | Łatwość użytkowania | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Wsparcie klienta | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Warte swojej ceny | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Funkcje | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Prawdopodobieństwo polecenia) | ## Informacje o sprzedawcy - **Firma**: Microsoft - **Location**: Redmond, USA - **Founded**: 1975 ## Commercial Context - **Cena początkowa**: 4,00 USD - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) (Bezpłatna wersja próbna) - **Target Audience**: Samozatrudnienie, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Chmura, SaaS, internetowy, Mac (pulpit), Windows (pulpit), Windows (stacjonarny), Linux (stacjonarny), Android (mobilny), iPhone (mobilny), iPad (mobilny) - **Supported Languages**: angielski - **Available Countries**: Arabia Saudyjska, Australia, Austria, Belgia, Białoruś, Brazylia, Bułgaria, Chiny, Chorwacja, Dania, Egipt, Estonia, Finlandia, Francja, Hiszpania, Holandia, Indie, Indonezja, Irak, Islandia and 27 more ## Funkcje - Automated Testing - Bezpieczeństwo aplikacji - Ciągła integracja - Ciągłe dostawy - Ciągłe wdrażanie - Debugowanie - Graficzny interfejs użytkownika - Gwarancja jakości - Kontrola wersji - Monitorowanie - Narzędzia do pracy zespołowej - Pulpit - Raportowanie/śledzenie projektu - Real-Time Analytics - Recenzja kodu - Rozwój współpracy - Skanowanie słabych punktów - Udostępnianie plików - Wychwytywanie błędów/problemów - Zarządzanie biletami - Zarządzanie konfiguracją - Zarządzanie projektami - Zarządzanie repozytorium - Zarządzanie sprawami - Zarządzanie zadaniami - Zarządzanie zaległościami - Zarządzanie zwolnieniami - Zintegrowane środowisko programistyczne - Śledzenie błędów - Śledzenie kamieni milowych - Śledzenie postępów w realizacji zadań - Śledzenie spraw ## Integrations (15 total) - CircleCI - Docker - Git - Heroku - JIRA Service Management - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Pivotal Tracker - Slack - Trello - Vercel - Visual Studio Code ## Support Options - E-mail/helpdesk - Często zadawane pytania/forum - Baza wiedzy ## Category - [Oprogramowanie do rozwoju aplikacji](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## Powiązane kategorie - [Oprogramowanie do rozwoju aplikacji](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [Systemy kontroli wersji](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) - [Aplikacje do zarządzania projektami w organizacji non profit](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) - [Programy do zarządzania projektami](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [Systemy ciągłej integracji](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/31119/continuous-integration/software) ## Rozwiązania alternatywne 1. [SpiraTeam](https://www.capterra.pl/software/85434/spirateam) — 4.2/5 (98 reviews) 2. [BugHerd](https://www.capterra.pl/software/129027/bugherd) — 4.7/5 (65 reviews) 3. [GitLab](https://www.capterra.pl/software/159806/gitlab) — 4.6/5 (1222 reviews) 4. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.pl/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (3013 reviews) 5. [ClickUp](https://www.capterra.pl/software/158833/clickup) — 4.6/5 (4590 reviews) ## Recenzje ### "The undisputed standard for code collaboration and open source" — 4.0/5 > **Davide** | *17 kwietnia 2026* | Bezpieczeństwo i dochodzenia | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Zalety**: GitHub Actions is the CI/CD tool I prefer over any other. It is immediate, works extremely well, supports multiple operating systems, and even allows you to run self-hosted runners on-premises with minimal setup. What makes it truly powerful is the ecosystem: thousands of community-built, reusable actions exist for almost every use case, so you rarely have to reinvent the wheel. This saves an enormous amount of time day to day. Beyond Actions, the pull request workflow is excellent and the collaboration features — Issues and Discussions in particular — are extremely convenient and well-designed. GitHub is also the de facto standard for open source: almost every meaningful open source project lives here, and the fact that public repositories are free makes it the natural home for community-driven software. I use it both for my personal open source projects and at an enterprise level, and it handles both scenarios very well. The ability to host public and private repositories on the same platform without needing separate tools is a significant advantage. > > **Wady**: The project management section (GitHub Projects) still feels rough compared to dedicated tools like Linear. It works, but the UX is unintuitive and I usually reach for other tools when I need real project tracking. Issues and Discussions are great; Projects needs more work. Stability has also become a concern. GitHub has been experiencing more frequent outages lately. They are usually short, but they are disruptive — when your entire workflow depends on GitHub (pushing code, running pipelines, reviewing PRs), even brief downtime brings everything to a halt. Finally, the notification system is genuinely broken for my use case. The sheer volume of notifications makes it nearly impossible to find the ones that actually matter — a comment on your own issue, a review request, a mention. I often miss important updates unless someone tells me directly or I stumble across them manually. > > GitHub is a tool I would recommend to any team, regardless of size or industry. Small teams can get started for free; larger organizations can scale up to GitHub Enterprise. The platform works equally well for closed-source commercial projects and public open source repositories, and you never need to split your work across multiple tools. I would especially recommend it to anyone building or contributing to open source software — GitHub is the central hub where projects are born, grow, and gain traction. There is simply no better place to build in public. It is also worth noting that GitHub is not limited to software developers. Writers, researchers, and academics can benefit from version-controlled plain-text workflows (Markdown, LaTeX) managed through branches and releases — and modern AI tooling makes the learning curve much more approachable than it used to be. In short: I could not work without GitHub. Despite its rough edges, it remains the most complete and widely adopted platform for code collaboration and version control available today. ----- ### "Reliable Platform for Version Control and Test Automation Collaboration" — 5.0/5 > **Sarav** | *20 maja 2026* | Oprogramowanie komputerowe | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Zalety**: GitHub made collaboration and version control very efficient for development and automation testing projects. I especially liked the seamless integration with VS Code, which made committing, reviewing, and managing code much easier directly from the editor. Using GitHub together with Playwright helped streamline test automation workflows, maintain test scripts, and collaborate effectively with team members through PRs and branch management. > > **Wady**: Managing merge conflicts and repository permissions sometimes required extra attention. Some advanced enterprise features and CI/CD capabilities may also become expensive for smaller teams. > > Overall, my experience with GitHub has been very positive. It has been a reliable platform for source code management, collaboration, and automation testing workflows. The integration with VS Code improved developer productivity, and using Playwright with GitHub helped organize and maintain automated test scripts efficiently. Features like pull requests, issue tracking, and GitHub Actions added value to the development lifecycle and team collaboration. ----- ### "Good tool for code management but lacks some features when integrating with Confluence/Jira" — 3.0/5 > **Mark** | *3 czerwca 2025* | Technologia i usługi informacyjne | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **Zalety**: GitHub is a great tool to manage pull requests and being able to add labels in our teams helps to differentiate between urgent items which need reviews and are vital for the next release. > > **Wady**: One of the drawbacks with GitHub is integrating non development team members into a workflow process. Even though it is possible to setup a workflow too add approvers the terminology and UI is very developer based so can be a bit confusing to non development colleagues. > > Overall GItHub is a good tool for managing code, getting reviews and merging into the relevant branch ahead of deployment. There are some good integrations but it would be great if it could work more seamlessly with Confluence and Jira, and provide additional features to help automatically manage the correct states of the linked jira. ----- ### "The Version Control Packed With Features" — 4.0/5 > **Zweryfikowany recenzent** | *27 maja 2026* | Dobra konsumpcyjne | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Zalety**: This version control makes coding, deployment and maintainance of repository easier for a team.The tool is also exceptional for automating workflows. Easy to integrate with other UI platforms such as source tree , making it user friendly. > > **Wady**: Permission and security management with access tokens can be complicated. For large enterprices, Github can be expensive. For a new user, advance features have a steap learning curve. > > overall, I have a positive experience with the platform. Github is a widely used version control platform helping team collaboration and clean coding. over the years, it has created a strong ecosystem of its own. The large online community makes the life of a user easier. ----- ### "Powerful Platform for Prototyping and Collaboration" — 4.0/5 > **Jerrid** | *10 kwietnia 2026* | Oprogramowanie komputerowe | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Zalety**: GitHub helps me keep my client projects organized and easy to manage. I use it to store and share prototypes, track versions, and show clients how things change over time. Being able to see changes and quickly go back if something doesn’t work is really helpful. It makes both my clients and me feel more confident as we try out new ideas and make improvements. > > **Wady**: The main downside of GitHub for me has been the support experience. It’s difficult to get direct help beyond the community, since you’re mostly limited to creating support tickets. Response times can be slow, and it often feels hard to get timely, personalized assistance when issues come up. > > Overall, GitHub has been a very effective platform. It gives me a reliable place to store projects, build and share prototypes, and manage version control so I can clearly show different iterations to clients and easily roll back if needed. While the support experience can be frustrating at times, especially the reliance on tickets and slower response times, the core features, stability, and collaboration tools have made it a valuable part of my workflow. ----- Page: 1 / 249\ Dalej: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pl/software/129067/github?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.pl/software/129067/github) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data