--- description: Dowiedz się wszystkiego na temat BrowserStack od zweryfikowanych użytkowników. Czytaj recenzje i odkrywaj podobne narzędzia na Capterra Polska! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: BrowserStack – Sprawdź cenę i opinie klientów | Capterra Polska --- Breadcrumb: [Strona główna](/) > [Narzędzia do automatycznego testowania oprogramowania](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/162900/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.capterra.pl/software/162900/browserstack Page: 1 / 32\ Dalej: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pl/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) > BrowserStack to platforma do testowania oprogramowania dla programistów, która umożliwia kompleksowe testowanie stron internetowych i aplikacji mobilnych pod kątem jakości. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 767 users. Top-rated for **Prawdopodobieństwo polecenia**. ----- ## Overview ### Kto korzysta z produktu: BrowserStack? Zespoły programistów w różnych branżach, w tym między innymi w finansach i ubezpieczeniach, edukacji, technologii, mediach i wydawnictwach, handlu detalicznym i innych. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Informacje ogólne** | **4.6/5** | 767 Recenzje | | Łatwość użytkowania | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Wsparcie klienta | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Warte swojej ceny | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Funkcje | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Prawdopodobieństwo polecenia) | ## Informacje o sprzedawcy - **Firma**: BrowserStack - **Founded**: 2011 ## Commercial Context - **Cena początkowa**: 39,00 USD - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) (Bezpłatna wersja próbna) - **Target Audience**: Samozatrudnienie, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Chmura, SaaS, internetowy, Mac (pulpit), Windows (pulpit) - **Supported Languages**: angielski - **Available Countries**: Australia, Brazylia, Brytyjskie Wyspy Dziewicze, Dania, Indie, Irlandia, Izrael, Kanada, Meksyk, Niemcy, Republika Południowej Afryki, Singapur, Stany Zjednoczone, Wielka Brytania, Wyspy Dziewicze Stanów Zjednoczonych, Zjednoczone Emiraty Arabskie ## Funkcje - Adnotacje - Ankiety i informacje zwrotne - Archiwizacja i przechowywanie - Automated Testing - Ciągła integracja - Gwarancja jakości - Identyfikacja wąskich gardeł - Identyfikowalność - Kontrola dostępu/zezwolenia - Kontrola wersji - Monitorowanie - Monitorowanie aktywności - Monitorowanie sieci - Multiple Test Types - Nagrywanie wideo/transkrypty - Narzędzia do pracy zespołowej - Obsługa wykonywania równoległego - Ostrzeżenia/powiadomienia - Raportowanie/analityka - Recenzje skryptów testowych - Scenariusze obciążenia - Skrypty testowe - Targetowanie odbiorców - Testowanie obciążeniowe - Testowanie stron internetowych - Testowanie wydajności - Testowanie za pomocą urządzeń mobilnych - Widok hierarchiczny - Wizualizacja danych - Wskaźniki ilościowe - Wskaźniki wydajności - Wykrywanie anomalii - Zarządzanie audytem - Zarządzanie dokumentami - Zarządzanie incydentami - Zarządzanie projektami - Zarządzanie przepływami pracy - Zarządzanie repozytorium - Zarządzanie ryzykiem - Zarządzanie testami - Zarządzanie testowaniem oprogramowania - Zarządzanie wydajnością - Zarządzanie wymaganiami - Ścieżka audytowa - Śledzenie defektów - Śledzenie spraw - Śledzenie zgodności z przepisami ## Integrations (16 total) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... and 1 more integrations ## Support Options - E-mail/helpdesk - Często zadawane pytania/forum - Baza wiedzy - Telefoniczna obsługa klienta - Czat ## Category - [Narzędzia do automatycznego testowania oprogramowania](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Powiązane kategorie - [Narzędzia do automatycznego testowania oprogramowania](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Bugtrackery](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [Narzędzia wspomagające testowanie oprogramowania](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/32295/user-testing/software) - [Narzędzia do testowania wydajności oprogramowania](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/32135/load-testing/software) - [Programy do zarządzania testami](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) ## Rozwiązania alternatywne 1. [TestRail](https://www.capterra.pl/software/128204/testrail) — 4.3/5 (178 reviews) 2. [Testsigma](https://www.capterra.pl/software/171626/testsigma) — 4.3/5 (19 reviews) 3. [Tricentis qTest](https://www.capterra.pl/software/173762/qtest) — 4.4/5 (27 reviews) 4. [WebLOAD](https://www.capterra.pl/software/138288/webload) — 4.2/5 (9 reviews) 5. [Tricentis Testim](https://www.capterra.pl/software/165430/testim) — 4.6/5 (50 reviews) ## Recenzje ### "New quality in app testing and QA" — 5.0/5 > **Dawid** | *2 kwietnia 2026* | Kadry | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Zalety**: I really like the AI integration in BrowserStack. The way they implemented it is genuinely useful, speeding up the process and sometimes suggesting or identifying problems that we might not have identified ourselves. I also appreciate the ease of accessing all kinds of devices and emulating not just their screen resolution but also different specificities. Additionally, being a cloud-based software, the setup was completely hassle-free. > > **Wady**: The software is developing quite fast and taking into account user feedback. No issues at this point. It is not the cheapest service in its category, but overall seems well worth the money. > > Withe BrowerStack we have been able to save a lot of time of manual testing and QA while at the same time ensuring best possible experience on a much wider range of devices and systems. A genuinely useful product for any mid-size software development company. ----- ### "Testing on multiple mobiles made easy" — 5.0/5 > **Anton** | *3 września 2024* | Oprogramowanie komputerowe | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Zalety**: Cross browser testing and debugging is quick, with easy to use interface. They provide real mobile and desktop browser combinations, including the newest iPhone and Android smartphones. Whatever device/browser your customers are using, they've got it. And eve though the device reaction time is not instant, you are viewing real device which is always better than even the best emulator. > > **Wady**: Local Testing using BrowserStack's provided binary sometimes didn't connect. > > This tool is essential for a frontend developer and tester. You can have a peace of mind that your pages display correctly on every popular device out there. ----- ### "Reliable Cross Browser Testing Tool - Browserstack" — 5.0/5 > **Yash** | *2 kwietnia 2026* | Technologia i usługi informacyjne | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Zalety**: - I can test on alomst any real iphone or android model without needing the physical hardwhere. - It makes it very easy to test my local dev env even when i'm behind a company's VPN. - It works well with our existing Playwright and Pyhton automation scripts. > > **Wady**: - There's often a big lag between my mouse click \& the remote devide responding. - It can take 20 30 sec, just to start a session, which feels slow when you are in a hurry. - It's definitely on the expensive side, especially when you start adding parallel testing slots for the team. > > It's a good tool that has become a part of our workflow. It helps us catch CSS bugs and layout issues on mobile Safari that we just can't see on desktop emulators. While the speed could be better and the cost is high, the reliability of testing on real devices makes it worth it for a professional team. ----- ### "Simplifying Testing with Real Devices and Seamless Automation" — 4.0/5 > **Abin** | *24 marca 2026* | Technologia i usługi informacyjne | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Zalety**: What I like most about BrowserStack is how easily it brings everything together in one place. I can quickly access a wide range of real devices and browsers for live testing, which makes debugging much faster and more reliable without needing to manage physical devices(using Live and App Live), while also avoiding the overhead of maintaining an in-house device lab. At the same time, the platform fits well into our automation workflow with Automate and App Automate, allowing us to run tests in parallel and integrate with CI/CD without much effort. It also helps keep things organized with its test management capabilities, so tracking and maintaining test cases becomes easier. Overall, it has made the entire testing process smoother and more efficient, and whenever I’ve needed help, the support team has been responsive and useful. > > **Wady**: One area where BrowserStack could improve is performance consistency at times, especially when using certain devices where sessions can feel slightly slow or laggy depending on network conditions. Also, while the platform offers a lot of features, it can take some time to fully explore and get comfortable with everything, especially for new users. Occasionally, debugging automation failures can require extra effort due to limited visibility compared to local environments. That said, these are relatively minor compared to the overall benefits the platform provides. > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It makes both manual and automated testing easier by providing quick access to real devices and browsers, without the need for managing infrastructure. It fits well into daily workflows, from quick debugging to running automated tests, and has helped improve testing speed and efficiency. While there are occasional minor performance lags, it remains a reliable and valuable tool for the QA process. ----- ### "Okay, but not the best for Test Management" — 3.0/5 > **Jess** | *2 kwietnia 2026* | Oprogramowanie komputerowe | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **Zalety**: They have the right idea with Test Management but the execution is a little iffy. For example the drag and drop for copying a test case will work for a bit, then stop. Their support team is top tier. > > **Wady**: The bugs, the execution of Test Management is a little iffy. For example the drag and drop for copying a test case will work for a bit, then stop. > > Overall its neutral. We ended up switching to Qase for better/cheaper AI test case creation. BrowserStacks support team has been great through the various issues but we did run into a lot of issues. ----- Page: 1 / 32\ Dalej: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pl/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.pl/software/162900/browserstack) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data