--- description: Dowiedz się wszystkiego na temat BrowserStack od zweryfikowanych użytkowników. Czytaj recenzje i odkrywaj podobne narzędzia na Capterra Polska! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: BrowserStack – Sprawdź cenę i opinie klientów | Capterra Polska --- Breadcrumb: [Strona główna](/) > [Narzędzia do automatycznego testowania oprogramowania](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/162900/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.capterra.pl/software/162900/browserstack Page: 1 / 32\ Dalej: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pl/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) > BrowserStack to platforma do testowania oprogramowania dla programistów, która umożliwia kompleksowe testowanie stron internetowych i aplikacji mobilnych pod kątem jakości. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 775 users. Top-rated for **Prawdopodobieństwo polecenia**. ----- ## Overview ### Kto korzysta z produktu: BrowserStack? Zespoły programistów w różnych branżach, w tym między innymi w finansach i ubezpieczeniach, edukacji, technologii, mediach i wydawnictwach, handlu detalicznym i innych. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Informacje ogólne** | **4.6/5** | 775 Recenzje | | Łatwość użytkowania | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Wsparcie klienta | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Warte swojej ceny | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Funkcje | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Prawdopodobieństwo polecenia) | ## Informacje o sprzedawcy - **Firma**: BrowserStack - **Founded**: 2011 ## Commercial Context - **Cena początkowa**: 39,00 USD - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) (Bezpłatna wersja próbna) - **Target Audience**: Samozatrudnienie, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Chmura, SaaS, internetowy, Mac (pulpit), Windows (pulpit) - **Supported Languages**: angielski - **Available Countries**: Australia, Brazylia, Brytyjskie Wyspy Dziewicze, Dania, Indie, Irlandia, Izrael, Kanada, Meksyk, Niemcy, Republika Południowej Afryki, Singapur, Stany Zjednoczone, Wielka Brytania, Wyspy Dziewicze Stanów Zjednoczonych, Zjednoczone Emiraty Arabskie ## Funkcje - Adnotacje - Ankiety i informacje zwrotne - Archiwizacja i przechowywanie - Automated Testing - Ciągła integracja - Gwarancja jakości - Identyfikacja wąskich gardeł - Identyfikowalność - Kontrola dostępu/zezwolenia - Kontrola wersji - Monitorowanie - Monitorowanie aktywności - Monitorowanie sieci - Multiple Test Types - Nagrywanie wideo/transkrypty - Narzędzia do pracy zespołowej - Obsługa wykonywania równoległego - Ostrzeżenia/powiadomienia - Raportowanie/analityka - Recenzje skryptów testowych - Scenariusze obciążenia - Skrypty testowe - Targetowanie odbiorców - Testowanie obciążeniowe - Testowanie stron internetowych - Testowanie wydajności - Testowanie za pomocą urządzeń mobilnych - Widok hierarchiczny - Wizualizacja danych - Wskaźniki ilościowe - Wskaźniki wydajności - Wykrywanie anomalii - Zarządzanie audytem - Zarządzanie dokumentami - Zarządzanie incydentami - Zarządzanie projektami - Zarządzanie przepływami pracy - Zarządzanie repozytorium - Zarządzanie ryzykiem - Zarządzanie testami - Zarządzanie testowaniem oprogramowania - Zarządzanie wydajnością - Zarządzanie wymaganiami - Ścieżka audytowa - Śledzenie defektów - Śledzenie spraw - Śledzenie zgodności z przepisami ## Integrations (16 total) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... and 1 more integrations ## Support Options - E-mail/helpdesk - Często zadawane pytania/forum - Baza wiedzy - Telefoniczna obsługa klienta - Czat ## Category - [Narzędzia do automatycznego testowania oprogramowania](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Powiązane kategorie - [Narzędzia do automatycznego testowania oprogramowania](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Bugtrackery](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [Narzędzia wspomagające testowanie oprogramowania](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/32295/user-testing/software) - [Narzędzia do testowania wydajności oprogramowania](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/32135/load-testing/software) - [Programy do zarządzania testami](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) ## Rozwiązania alternatywne 1. [TestRail](https://www.capterra.pl/software/128204/testrail) — 4.3/5 (179 reviews) 2. [Tricentis qTest](https://www.capterra.pl/software/173762/qtest) — 4.4/5 (27 reviews) 3. [WebLOAD](https://www.capterra.pl/software/138288/webload) — 4.2/5 (9 reviews) 4. [Tricentis Testim](https://www.capterra.pl/software/165430/testim) — 4.6/5 (50 reviews) ## Recenzje ### "New quality in app testing and QA" — 5.0/5 > **Dawid** | *2 kwietnia 2026* | Kadry | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Zalety**: I really like the AI integration in BrowserStack. The way they implemented it is genuinely useful, speeding up the process and sometimes suggesting or identifying problems that we might not have identified ourselves. I also appreciate the ease of accessing all kinds of devices and emulating not just their screen resolution but also different specificities. Additionally, being a cloud-based software, the setup was completely hassle-free. > > **Wady**: The software is developing quite fast and taking into account user feedback. No issues at this point. It is not the cheapest service in its category, but overall seems well worth the money. > > Withe BrowerStack we have been able to save a lot of time of manual testing and QA while at the same time ensuring best possible experience on a much wider range of devices and systems. A genuinely useful product for any mid-size software development company. ----- ### "Testing on multiple mobiles made easy" — 5.0/5 > **Anton** | *3 września 2024* | Oprogramowanie komputerowe | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Zalety**: Cross browser testing and debugging is quick, with easy to use interface. They provide real mobile and desktop browser combinations, including the newest iPhone and Android smartphones. Whatever device/browser your customers are using, they've got it. And eve though the device reaction time is not instant, you are viewing real device which is always better than even the best emulator. > > **Wady**: Local Testing using BrowserStack's provided binary sometimes didn't connect. > > This tool is essential for a frontend developer and tester. You can have a peace of mind that your pages display correctly on every popular device out there. ----- ### "Fast and Efficient Browser Testing" — 5.0/5 > **Yash** | *9 lipca 2026* | Technologia i usługi informacyjne | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Zalety**: BrowserStack is easy to use and offers excellent browser and device coverage for efficient cross-browser testing. It saves time by quickly identifying compatibility issues across different environments. > > **Wady**: The pricing can be expensive for smaller teams, and remote sessions may occasionally experience slight lag. Some advanced features also take time for new users to learn. > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been very good. It's a reliable and user-friendly platform that makes cross-browser testing fast and efficient. ----- ### "The Unfair Advantage Every QA/Automation Team Deserves" — 5.0/5 > **Yogesh** | *2 kwietnia 2026* | Chemia | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Zalety**: Five years on the enterprise plan and the one thing I like most is how BrowserStack completely removes infrastructure as a problem. Real devices with SIM support, thousands of browser and OS combinations, instant availability, no maintenance overhead. App Live and App Automate work seamlessly with Selenium, Appium, Playwright and most of automation tools without any complex setup. Parallel execution is significantly faster than any self hosted grid I have managed. The newly released no code low code testing is also best, accessibility testing and visual regression tools are production ready and not just checkboxes. For an enterprise team this is the best investment in the testing stack. > > **Wady**: Pricing is the one honest gripe. BrowserStack is worth every rupee but it is not cheap, and for smaller teams or startups the enterprise plan can feel like a stretch. Parallel session limits on lower tiers push you to upgrade faster than expected and when your team scales quickly, the cost scales with it in a way that requires a conversation with finance every renewal cycle. > > BrowserStack did not just improve our testing workflow, It transformed how our entire engineering culture thinks about quality. The chaos before was real. Flaky emulators, inconsistent local device setups, test results that meant nothing because the environment was never stable. Onboarding a new automation tool meant weeks of configuration, compatibility debugging and infrastructure work before a single meaningful test ran. From day one on the BS plan the difference was visible. Real devices, real browsers, real network conditions, available instantly, every single time. No queues, no "device is offline," no environment drift. The confidence in our test results changed overnight because the platform underneath them was finally reliable. Across multiple automation tools integration experience has been consistently smooth. Switching frameworks mid project did not mean rebuilding infrastructure, It meant updating a config and moving on. That kind of flexibility is rare and genuinely underappreciated until you have worked without it. App Live became the go to for exploratory testing on real devices with SIM support. App Automate handled mobile regression at a scale and speed a physical device lab three times our budget could not have matched. The freedom to choose between virtual and real devices depending on the test objective gave us precision we simply did not have before. The no code and low code capabilities brought manual QA members directly into the automation process, accessibility testing and visual regression are now standard pipeline stages, not separate afterthought tools. Everything lives in one platform, reporting is unified and session management gives complete visibility into what ran, when and exactly why something failed. Enterprise support has been a genuine partner throughout, Issues resolved by people who actually understand automation deeply, not generic ticket handlers. There is a reason it remains the one tool in the stack that has never been up for replacement. It is not just a platform, it is the foundation our entire quality process is built on. ----- ### "Okay, but not the best for Test Management" — 3.0/5 > **Jess** | *2 kwietnia 2026* | Oprogramowanie komputerowe | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **Zalety**: They have the right idea with Test Management but the execution is a little iffy. For example the drag and drop for copying a test case will work for a bit, then stop. Their support team is top tier. > > **Wady**: The bugs, the execution of Test Management is a little iffy. For example the drag and drop for copying a test case will work for a bit, then stop. > > Overall its neutral. We ended up switching to Qase for better/cheaper AI test case creation. BrowserStacks support team has been great through the various issues but we did run into a lot of issues. ----- Page: 1 / 32\ Dalej: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pl/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.pl/software/162900/browserstack) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data