--- description: Dowiedz się wszystkiego na temat Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite od zweryfikowanych użytkowników. Czytaj recenzje i odkrywaj podobne narzędzia na Capterra Polska! image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite – Sprawdź cenę i opinie klientów | Capterra Polska --- Breadcrumb: [Strona główna](/) > [Oprogramowanie doo przechwytywania danych elektronicznych](/directory/30551/electronic-data-capture/software) > [Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite](/software/192454/research-manager) # Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite Canonical: https://www.capterra.pl/software/192454/research-manager Page: 1 / 6\ Dalej: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pl/software/192454/research-manager?page=2) > ResearchManager daje możliwości, dostarczając narzędzia eClinical EDC, CTMS i ERMS. Już od 79 $ miesięcznie. > > Verdict: Rated **4.2/5** by 118 users. Top-rated for **Prawdopodobieństwo polecenia**. ----- ## Overview ### Kto korzysta z produktu: Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite? Posiadamy referencje w różnych sektorach na całym świecie, takich jak urządzenia medyczne, farmacja i biotechnologia, firmy CRO (organizacja badań klinicznych), instytucje akademickie, służby zdrowia i IRB (medyczne komisje etyczne/instytucjonalne rady ds. przeglądów). ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Informacje ogólne** | **4.2/5** | 118 Recenzje | | Łatwość użytkowania | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Wsparcie klienta | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Warte swojej ceny | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Funkcje | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 Prawdopodobieństwo polecenia) | ## Informacje o sprzedawcy - **Firma**: Cloud9-Software - **Location**: Deventer, Holandia - **Founded**: 2013 ## Commercial Context - **Target Audience**: Samozatrudnienie, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Chmura, SaaS, internetowy - **Supported Languages**: angielski, niderlandzki, niemiecki - **Available Countries**: Afganistan, Albania, Algieria, Andora, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua i Barbuda, Arabia Saudyjska, Argentyna, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbejdżan, Bahamy, Bahrajn, Bangladesz, Barbados, Belgia, Belize and 204 more ## Funkcje - EMR/EHR - Elektroniczne przechwytywanie danych - Importowanie/eksportowanie danych - Klasyfikacja dokumentów - Monitorowanie pacjentów - Obrazowanie dokumentów - Projekt wersji próbnej - Przechwytywanie obrazu - Przechwytywanie rozproszone - Raportowanie/analityka - Rekrutacja pacjentów - Third-Party Integrations - Ustalanie harmonogramów - Zarządzanie dokumentami - Zarządzanie finansami - Zarządzanie formularzami - Zarządzanie pacjentami - Zarządzanie przepływami pracy - Zarządzanie zapasami - Zarządzanie zgodnością z przepisami - Zdalne przechwytywanie danych - Zgodność z częścią 11 tytułu 21 CFR - Zgodność z przepisami HIPAA - Ścieżka audytowa ## Integrations (10 total) - AFAS Software - Clue - ExactSpent - Fitbit - Freestyle Solutions - Polar - Samsung SDS - Wahoo Trace - Whoop - Zwift ## Support Options - E-mail/helpdesk - Często zadawane pytania/forum - Baza wiedzy - Telefoniczna obsługa klienta - 24/7 (agent na żywo) - Czat ## Category - [Oprogramowanie doo przechwytywania danych elektronicznych](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/30551/electronic-data-capture/software) ## Powiązane kategorie - [Oprogramowanie doo przechwytywania danych elektronicznych](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/30551/electronic-data-capture/software) - [Oprogramowanie dla ośrodków badań klinicznych](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/10035/clinical-trial-management/software) - [Programy do wprowadzania danych](https://www.capterra.pl/directory/30543/data-entry/software) ## Rozwiązania alternatywne 1. [Castor EDC](https://www.capterra.pl/software/143532/castor-edc) — 4.7/5 (204 reviews) 2. [Florence eBinders](https://www.capterra.pl/software/200364/florence-ebinders) — 4.5/5 (83 reviews) 3. [ShareCRF](https://www.capterra.pl/software/1031214/sharecrf) — 4.8/5 (44 reviews) 4. [Flex Databases platform](https://www.capterra.pl/software/124010/flex-databases-platform) — 4.5/5 (13 reviews) 5. [Health Cloud](https://www.capterra.pl/software/172299/health-cloud) — 4.4/5 (62 reviews) ## Recenzje ### "Efficient Clinical Research Management Platform with Strong Workflow Capabilities" — 4.0/5 > **Mateusz** | *11 czerwca 2026* | Badania | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **Zalety**: The platform helps centralize study management activities in one place, improving collaboration between research teams. I particularly appreciated the document management functionality, workflow support, and the ability to track study progress efficiently. The system promotes better organization and transparency across research projects. > > **Wady**: The user interface can feel somewhat complex for first-time users, and some advanced functions are not immediately intuitive. Additional customization options for reports and dashboards would be beneficial. The initial setup and onboarding process may require dedicated training. > > Overall, my experience with Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite has been positive. The platform provides a comprehensive environment for managing research activities and helps streamline administrative and operational tasks. While there is a learning curve, the benefits in terms of organization, compliance support, and workflow efficiency outweigh the challenges. It is a valuable solution for research organizations seeking to improve study management processes. ----- ### "Highly recommended Clinical Research Suite" — 5.0/5 > **Piotr** | *11 czerwca 2026* | Szpitale i opieka zdrowotna | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Zalety**: Value for money, affordable subscription model, customer support, ability to customize. Deploying our questionnaires was easy. Data collection worked seamless with recruitment team. > > **Wady**: Nothing worth mentioning. There are indeed no cons of their solution stack. We were 100% satisfied with RM. > > We performed a RCT study using RM software. This i a great value for money top notch subscription based Clinical Research Suite. Their Customer Service and Customizing options are unbeatable\! Highly Recommended for any digital healthcare startup intending to validate its products for clinical efficacy\! ----- ### "Excellent software" — 5.0/5 > **Zweryfikowany recenzent** | *2 września 2023* | Szpitale i opieka zdrowotna | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Zalety**: Can exchange data with other research teams, even those working on projects at different trial sites.Provides the ability for electronic signatures, making it simpler to get informed approval from study participants and record it. > > **Wady**: Time consuming when transferring large data set from the application ----- ### "Descent EDC" — 4.0/5 > **Noudjoum** | *24 czerwca 2026* | Farmaceutyka | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **Zalety**: I liked the ease of use of it, the validation steps were easy and not too much complainte from the sites about data entry. The reporting is good. > > **Wady**: The roles \! They are all prédéfined in the system and cannot be customized, the query management is not convenient, and the customer service is in Rurope which made it difficult for urgent matters. > > I run three studies on it and the three of them run smoothly. Data entry was easy, data validation was easy too. The lock and data extraction were also straight forward. ----- ### "User-friendly system with potential for improvement" — 3.0/5 > **Marta** | *25 czerwca 2026* | Szpitale i opieka zdrowotna | Recommendation rating: 5.0/10 > > **Zalety**: What I liked most about ResearchManager is that, from a monitor’s perspective, the system is quite intuitive and easy to navigate. The layout is clear and logical, which makes it relatively easy to find the necessary information. > > **Wady**: From a monitor’s perspective, the weakest point is that SDV can only be performed for closed visits, and only at the page level rather than for individual data points. In other systems, I have seen a more practical solution where each data point has a default status of “SDV not performed”, which can then be changed to “SDV performed” or “SDV not OK”. If “SDV performed” is selected and the site subsequently changes the entered data, the status automatically changes to “Data changed after SDV”. In my opinion, this functionality greatly facilitates monitoring and the tracking of all data changes. Another problematic aspect is the lack of possibility to raise queries in empty visits. In such cases, I have to contact the site separately by email and provide screenshots from the eCRF to indicate the missing data. It would also be very helpful if the query status were clearly visible, i.e. whether a query has already been addressed and closed or whether it still requires action. Currently, it is only visible that a query has been raised for a given parameter, but the actual status is not clear. In addition, in the query list, it would be very useful to see the specific queries linked to specific parameters, rather than only the sections in which the queries were raised. If there are many parameters and several queries, it is easy to overlook one of them. > > Overall, my experience has been positive. I find the system quite intuitive and easy to work with, but I think some improvements, especially in SDV and query management, could make it even better :) ----- Page: 1 / 6\ Dalej: [Next page](https://www.capterra.pl/software/192454/research-manager?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.pl/software/192454/research-manager) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data